Ahh, I'm back in the virtual world after two days sans cable and internet. The technician they sent out referred to the root of the problem as a "rotten wire" that he replaced. Ah, those techies and their technobabble... anyway...
Maria (whose blog you should make time to read, incidentally) was kind enough to post a comment in my last post
I'm curious. Ron
Paul is a Republican and fairly conservative. Not sure why you used the word
"liberal" regarding his followers. I've watched every single
Republican debate (know thine enemies) and I honestly dislike ALL of them,
especially Gingrich and Romney. I am intrigued by Ron Paul's statements about
racial slurs in his newsletters a couple decades ago. That matters to me since
I tend to believe that once you're a racist, you rarely change your mind. I
honestly cannot fathom any of these candidates as being worthy of president.
So, sticking with Obama. I think he has been unfairly maligned. I compare it to
buying a house. If you buy a house in disrepair, it takes time to fix
everything. And if all the carpenters, plumbers and electricians refuse to help
you, you have your work cut out for you. That is how I see Obama's presidency.
He inherited a mess from Bush and the Republicans in the house and senate
refuse to lift a finger to help him clean it up. So,he is handicapped. But, I
still like him. Plus, I'm in the medical profession and I FULLY support his
health care plan. It astonishes me that NO ONE seems to be able to see the big
picture regarding health care.
Ok...off
my soap box. Carry on!
Sorry, I didn’t mean to suggest that Ron
Paul supporters are liberals. If it came
out that way, I apologize. I write these
blog posts (and especially this past one) shooting from the hip and spend
minimal time revising them and making them… you know… concise.
What I was driving at was that while the
majority of Paul’s support is the “libertarian” (and I use those quotes
deliberately) wing of the Republican party, Paul’s campaign has managed to dupe
a significant minority of progressives, mainly due to his opposition of the war
in Iraq and to a lesser degree, his stance on legalizing marijuana. In my post specifically, I was agreeing with
a piece written on CBS.com by the Nation’s Katha Pollitt (which I probably
should have linked to). And even as I
write this, there’s a piece in the Atlantic :
Should Liberals Support Ron Paul? by Robert Wright. I’m not suggesting that too many liberals
would vote for the guy, but it seems that a lot of people on forums, in
conversation etc. hold Paul up as an example of a Republican of principle,
which drives me nuts when one takes a cursory glance at his stance on most
issues. Get past the war and pot, and
he’s the most toxically conservative candidate out there. Don’t get me wrong, Paul should be lauded for
liberal stances when he takes them. But
they should not overshadow his stances on just about everything else. And I agree, a racist doesn't change their spots, at least not without a lot of inner soul-searching and struggling with their thoughts, and something tells me that behind closed doors, Paul is very comfortable with racism.
I wholeheartedly agree with you about
Obama. Anyone would have a tough time
repairing the damage the Bush administration caused, even with everyone’s full
cooperation, let alone the open hostility that Obama has faced. That’s not to say he hasn’t made mistakes. He has… but it seems to me that for the
majority of his first term, the people voted, dusted off their hands and said
to themselves ‘well that takes care of that’ and left him to do his thing. If Obama let his liberal base down, then to
be fair, a lot of his liberal base let him down too. They forgot the ‘we’ part of Yes We Can.
Yeah, yeah, I know easier said than done,
and I sound like a scolding ass, especially in 2009 a LOT of people were more
concerned with keeping their heads above water and food on the table than
anything else. Who has that kind of
time? But I think we really failed (I’m
talking to Canadians now too, as we STILL have a right-wing tool leading our
country, and with a majority in parliament to boot) to take the lessons of
Bush-era politics that democracy doesn’t end at the voting booth. It’s heartening to see things like the Wisconsin union protests and the Occupy movement because
at least progressive issues are getting in the news, and sometimes even without
a dismissive sneer. They aren’t
instantaneous results, but it’s a step.
And that’s the point. Progress
doesn’t come in gigantic leaps. They
come in steps. Small steps. Tiny steps.
Steps virtually anyone can do, even without a lot of time and money. Enough people do them and the ball rolls. The key is that those steps need to be consistent ones.
I don’t see why or how anyone can vote
Republican, or at least this modern incarnation of the Republican Party (my
knowledge of the Republican Party of years past is sketchy at best). I’m not strictly talking policy, although I do
find their policy hard to swallow. I’m
talking heart – Republican politicians have such an open and naked contempt for
people, they barely even disguise it anymore.
I guess it appeals to people who feel the need for self-flagellation,
who feel frustrated and unworthy, and blame themselves for the situation they
find themselves in. It also doesn’t
surprise me that the main Republican target is ‘government’, which neatly
attacks the one institution in society that the public have a measure of power
in. And so many people are willing to
believe that ‘government is the problem’ (whatever that means) without once
realizing that they, as citizens in a democratic country, are part of the
government they despise so much. And not
one of their supporters questions why, if Big Government is so bad, are their
leaders more than happy to be a part of it?
It is a living, breathing example of Orwellian doublethink so hideously perfect
that I used it when my neighbour’s daughter was having trouble understanding
the concept when she was studying 1984 in school.
I do have ties to the United States, as my
brother, my sister-in-law and their two kids live in the States, so I hope they
choose politicians that don’t openly hate them because they are concerned and
compassionate people that would like to live in a country where people look
after each other, and not be hysterically labeled socialists because of
it. It seems to me, as an outsider
looking in, there’s a lot of needless and confusing fear-mongering in American
politics, and it’s something that most non-Americans have a hard time wrapping
our minds around. It not like racism,
class divisions, homophobia, fear, mistrust, poverty and crime doesn’t exist
here or in other countries. It all
certainly does. But we somehow manage
not to assume a worst-case scenario mentality about things. More than a few people grumbled when we
legalized same-sex marriages, but most of us were leveled-headed enough to be
sure that a one-way vortex to hell wasn’t going to open up beneath our feet,
that it wasn’t a life-or-death issue. As
we all found out quickly enough, gays and lesbians getting married became
background scenery in our national psyche.
It arrived and we did not become Sodom or Gommorah. Now, apart from a handful of fundamentalist
crackpots, it doesn’t even register for most people, liberal or conservative. I don’t know, but I think that’s what scares
conservative politicians the most – the realization that all of us aren’t so
much different from one another and we do have far more common ground than we
realize. I think that is the real opposition to social issues. It isn't a question of morality for them. It's a fear of the truth that despite our differences in race, gender and orientation, we are more or less the same when it comes to basic human wants and needs. We want good jobs, safe streets, warm houses to go home to and loving people to share it all with.
Okay, this is why I don’t blog
politics. I get a teensy bit long-winded
and get way off topic and my wagging finger gets tired. I’m having a beer, a nap and then I'm going to a friend's acoustic show at the local pub, and she is going to ROCK! Later.
- PW
Smiling. We are in almost total agreement. And you are no babbler.
ReplyDelete